![]() ![]() We do not know and cannot know what is covered by one’s clothing without their straight consent. We understand the question was about filters to prevent producing and so on, but we cannot even treat a produced image as porn, as it is just an art created by the artificial artist and nothing more. ![]() “We wanted to add some kind of filter to pre-check that the image is not a cartoon frame or a male image and that there are not too many clothes… But this turned out to be unnecessary, as our service is paid: people just don’t want to spend money on knowingly awful result. Giving people unfettered access to creating nude images, at the very least, seems like a really bad idea without filters in place. Then, of course, there’s the question about potential restrictions on what users can upload. We are going to introduce credit card payments quite soon, but to be honest, I am not the biggest fan of credit cards.” We would like to keep the deepnude.to visitors away from this and protect their privacy. We seek privacy in this world dominated by big data companies that can already predict our behaviour, keep profiles on our taste of food, leisure and even the most intimate desires. “We are libertarian in our day to day life. However, while NudifierApp says that the crypto requirement is for ensuring user privacy, DeepNude.to says there are plans to accept credit card payments. It is just a mass-media panic.” Libertarian idealsīoth services, if you check them out yourself, are run entirely anonymously, and both are only currently available to people willing to pay in crypto currencies. So we don’t see any ethical problems regardless of deepnude quality. But look, if deepnudes become indistinguishable from real nudes (which will never happen, of course), it will solve any issues related to revenge porn forever. ![]() So you can even reach the same result as a professional fake artist in just one minute or less. “The quality mostly depends on thoroughness of using advanced mode. Indeed, he added that if the technology became accurate enough, it would actually help the problem of revenge porn – an argument that seems a little circular from where we’re sat. But usually it is still easy to identify whether the nude is created by net,” the anonymous founder of the NudifierApp told us. “There are a lot of forks of DeepNude and people who want to use the technology maliciously can do it regardless of our existence. If you want to do damage, you will be using far more sophisticated tools.” “Plus let’s be honest it is miles away from looking even remotely real. Besides that, we are embedding visible and invisible watermarks to highlight that this content is fake,” one of the DeepNude.to team told SEXTECHGUIDE. Moreover, we have terms of service that the users have to accept before uploading any images. “We are not explicitly breaking any existing law. There are already laws against revenge porn (though these, arguably, aren’t really working), so we got in touch with the anonymous founders behind DeepNude.to and NudifierApp to get their perspective. The legality of producing these images, however, seems questionable. Obviously, in that time, some people downloaded it – and a few more forked it to produce their own DeepNude based services.īoth of the services uncovered so far – DeepNude.to and NudifierApp – charge users for access to the software, with the former offering 5 free credits, and the latter offering only paid plans, but with wider app support. More problematically, however, is that the original DeepNude software was released online briefly, before being pulled. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |